Fundamentals vs Narratives
Crypto prices swing on both fundamentals (usage, revenue) and narratives (AI, L2s, memecoins). You'll learn to separate signal from hype and build balanced theses.
Who Is This For?
- •Investors building mid-term theses
- •Traders who want to avoid chasing every trend
Learning Objectives
- 1.Distinguish measurable fundamentals from social narratives
- 2.Track on-chain and off-chain indicators that matter
- 3.Build entry/exit plans that account for hype cycles
What Fundamentals Look Like
Fundamentals are measurable, on-chain signals of real usage and value creation. They're what remains when the hype fades.
📊 Fundamental Metrics Explorer
💰Protocol Revenue / Fees
Actual fees paid by users to use the protocol. The most direct measure of product-market fit — real people paying real money.
Consistent or growing fees across market conditions. Revenue that persists even in bear markets shows genuine demand.
Fees that only spike during speculative manias, or fees that are heavily subsidized by token incentives.
💎 Token Value Capture
Protocol success ≠ token success. The critical question: how does usage flow to token holders?
🔥Buyback & Burn
Protocol uses revenue to buy tokens on the open market and burn them, reducing supply. Similar to stock buybacks.
Understanding Narratives
Narratives are the stories that move capital. They can front-run fundamentals by months — or collapse overnight with nothing underneath.
🔥 Active Narrative Explorer
AI & Crypto
Mid-cycleIntersection of AI and blockchain — decentralized compute, AI agents with wallets, data marketplaces, inference networks.
Medium — real compute demand exists but most AI tokens lack proven revenue. Some have genuine GPU networks.
AI hype may outpace crypto-specific utility. Many projects are wrappers with no moat. Centralized AI (OpenAI, Google) may dominate.
Look for protocols with actual GPU utilization metrics and paying customers, not just partnerships and announcements.
🔄 The Narrative Lifecycle
Every narrative follows a predictable cycle. Knowing where you are changes the playbook:
💡Innovation Trigger
A new concept emerges — a whitepaper, a working demo, or a breakthrough technology. Early adopters get excited. Price is low, risk is high, information is scarce.
Blending Both
⚖️ Hype vs Substance Scorer
Evaluate any project by checking hype signals against substance signals:
Neither fundamentally strong nor narratively hot. Probably not worth attention right now. Revisit if metrics improve.
📝 Investment Thesis Builder
Structure your thinking before committing capital:
🚨 Weak on both fronts. Not enough evidence to build a position. Keep researching or move to another opportunity.
Common Mistakes & Gotchas
🎯 Golden Rule: The best investments pair strong fundamentals with an emerging narrative. Fundamentals give you a floor; narratives give you a catalyst. Without fundamentals, you're speculating. Without narrative, you may be early — which is fine, if you have patience.
Knowledge Check
Name two examples of fundamental metrics for evaluating a crypto project.
What is a narrative in crypto markets?
Why set invalidation criteria for an investment thesis?
Which stage of the narrative cycle is the riskiest for new entries?
Why might a protocol with strong usage still have a underperforming token?